1 BTC
=
- USD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF
As of May 30, 2026 at 08:57 UTC
Chart
About Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF
No description available.
Market Statistics
Trading Metrics
How to Buy RSPS
Create Your Account
Sign up, deposit BTC, and transfer it to your Unified Trading Account. It only takes a moment.
Start Your Trade
From Terminal, click Trade Now on the asset you want to buy. You'll be purchasing its tokenized asset.
Buy RSPS
Enter the amount and confirm your purchase. That's it! You'll see the impact of the trade in your Unified Trading Account.
New to Tokenized Assets? Learn more in our Help Center.
Latest News
5 articlesThe article compares two consumer staples ETFs: State Street's XLP and Invesco's RSPS. XLP offers lower costs (0.08% expense ratio), stronger 1-year returns (6.40%), and better liquidity with $14.6B AUM, making it ideal for investors seeking mega-cap exposure. RSPS uses equal-weighting across 37 holdings with a higher expense ratio (0.40%) and slightly higher dividend yield (2.80%), appealing to investors wanting broader diversification. XLP's performance has outpaced RSPS significantly over 5 years.
FSTA and RSPS offer different approaches to consumer staples ETF investing. FSTA charges a lower expense ratio (0.08% vs 0.40%), has significantly larger assets under management ($1.5B vs $253.2M), and concentrates heavily in mega-cap stocks like Walmart and Costco. RSPS equally weights 35 stocks, offering higher dividend yield (2.9% vs 2.2%) and broader sector exposure. FSTA delivered stronger recent returns (1.48% vs -5.02% over 1 year) with shallower drawdowns, making it the simpler default choice, while RSPS appeals to income-focused investors seeking less concentration risk.
Bunge Global announced ambitious growth targets during its 2026 Investor Day, including mid-cycle EPS guidance of $15 by 2030 (up from $13 baseline) and a commitment to return at least 50% of discretionary cash flow to shareholders through dividends and buybacks. The company authorized $3 billion in share repurchases. However, fiscal 2026 adjusted earnings guidance of $7.50-$8 per share came in below analyst expectations of $8.71.
Two consumer staples ETFs—XLP (market-cap weighted) and RSPS (equal weighted)—offer different investment approaches. XLP has lower fees (0.08% vs 0.40%), larger assets ($16B vs $250M), and concentrates 28% in top three holdings. RSPS provides more balanced exposure across 36 holdings with slightly better 1-year returns (11.75% vs 9.94%). The choice depends on whether investors prefer exposure to industry leaders or broader diversification.
Vanguard's VDC and Invesco's RSPS both offer consumer staples exposure but differ significantly in approach. VDC is larger ($9.05B AUM), cheaper (0.09% expense ratio), and cap-weighted with 100+ holdings, delivering better 5-year returns ($1,375 on $1,000). RSPS is smaller ($249.67M AUM), more expensive (0.40% ratio), equally-weighted with 37 holdings, and offers higher dividend yield (2.63% vs 2.10%). VDC suits cost-conscious investors seeking diversification, while RSPS appeals to income-focused investors preferring balanced exposure without mega-cap dominance.
