1 BTC
=
- USD
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
As of May 30, 2026 at 09:10 UTC
Chart
About Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
No description available.
Market Statistics
Trading Metrics
How to Buy FTEC
Create Your Account
Sign up, deposit BTC, and transfer it to your Unified Trading Account. It only takes a moment.
Start Your Trade
From Terminal, click Trade Now on the asset you want to buy. You'll be purchasing its tokenized asset.
Buy FTEC
Enter the amount and confirm your purchase. That's it! You'll see the impact of the trade in your Unified Trading Account.
New to Tokenized Assets? Learn more in our Help Center.
Latest News
5 articlesRoundhill Investments' Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) significantly outperformed Fidelity's MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) over the past year with 137.8% returns versus 60.5%, driven by concentrated AI exposure. However, CHAT charges a higher expense ratio (0.75% vs 0.08%), holds only 52 companies versus FTEC's 286, and experienced greater maximum drawdown (31.3% vs 27.3%), making it riskier despite superior short-term performance.
Fidelity's MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) offers lower fees (0.08% vs 0.34%) and broader diversification with 286 holdings compared to iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX), which focuses on 30 semiconductor companies. While SOXX delivered higher 1-year returns (173.10% vs 57.90%), FTEC provides less volatility and is better suited for investors uncomfortable with semiconductor-specific concentration risk.
Fidelity's FTEC and State Street's XLK are both low-cost technology ETFs with identical 0.08% expense ratios. XLK is larger with $87.7B in assets and holds 73 stocks with higher concentration in mega-cap tech, while FTEC holds 294 stocks offering broader diversification but with higher volatility. XLK is better for active traders seeking income, while FTEC suits investors wanting broader tech exposure.
Fidelity's FTEC and iShares' IYW both offer U.S. technology exposure but differ significantly in cost, diversification, and sector definition. FTEC charges a lower expense ratio (0.08% vs 0.38%), holds nearly twice as many companies (294 vs 139), and offers higher dividend yield, making it ideal for cost-conscious investors. IYW takes a broader approach to tech classification, including communication services stocks like Alphabet, and concentrates more heavily in mega-cap names. Both delivered similar one-year returns (~24%), though FTEC showed less volatility over five years.
The article compares two technology ETFs: SOXX, a focused semiconductor fund with 30 holdings and higher volatility, versus FTEC, a broad tech ETF with 290 holdings and lower fees. SOXX has outperformed FTEC over the past year (66.8% vs 24.3%) but carries greater concentration risk in the cyclical semiconductor industry. FTEC offers diversified tech exposure at a lower cost (0.08% expense ratio) but is heavily weighted toward mega-cap names like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft. The choice depends on investor risk tolerance and sector conviction.